The first paper of the year was presented to joint meeting with the Institute of Asphalt Technology. Over 60 members and guests attended to hear the presentations by two industry experts on the impact of the working time directive with particular reference to the haulage industry.

The first speaker - Gerry McLaughlin of QPA dealt with the legislative issues. He outlined the background of the Directive, which had been adopted in March 2002 and would be fully implemented by 23 March 2005 - no going back. The speaker then went on to expand on the main points of contention - the definition of night time working - likely to be 00.00 to 04.00 hours; the 48 hour working week and Contract Hauliers. With reference to the last point further explanation was given that showed even an apparently independent haulier if he has any form of hierarchical relationship will not be considered a contractor and will be liable for full compliance with the regulations. It was also stated that any form of opt out was extremely unlikely.

The second speaker was Ian Cooper who was from the tank freight division of Excel Logistics including responsibility for bitumen deliveries to coating plants. Mr Cooper commenced by giving an indication of the impact for their business, which employed over 6000 drivers and could potentially require an increase of 25% to be able to operate under the Directive. He stated that the way they operate at present would not be possible with the WTD. In future far greater flexibility from their workforce and operations would be required to be able to meet their customer's requirements. This will include more intelligent use of driver time; optimisation of productive time; reduction of long haul journeys.

He suggested that customers may be able to help with: better ordering; better stocking - Just in Time delivery is difficult to manage; reduction in need for long hauls; a wider delivery envelope - night deliveries; avoidance of short term fluctuations. In question time it was recognised that some of these were only achievable in an ideal world.

Mr Cooper closed by outlining the major project they are now working on to review how they operate, looking at improved response planning looking at compliance with legislation, minimising impact on the customer, while still trying to run a profitable business. The first phase included auditing how they are currently operating and communicating as well as negotiation with their workforce. The second phase would look at priorities to be addressed and deal with cost issues.

A lively question time focussed on the cost impact on the quarry industry and difficulties in managing deliveries. The meeting was closed with a vote of thanks from Branch Vice Chairman, Kevin Sargant.